Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : A person who write about his own life writers-.

a) a biography

b) a diary

c) a chronicle

d) an autobiography

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : 'Botany' is to 'plants' as 'Zoology' is to-.

a) dear

b) animals

c) trees

d) Flowers

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : আপনি কি ধূমপানযুক্ত অথবা ধূমপানমুক্ত রুম চান?

a) Do you prefer smoking or non-smoking room?

b) Do you prefer an smoking or non-smoking room?

c) Do you prefer a smoking or non-smoking room?

d) Do you prefer a smoking or a non-smoking room?

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : তুমি কি বাজারের দিকে যাচ্ছ?

a) Are you going to toward market?

b) Are you going toward market?

c) Are you go to toward market?

d) You are going toward market?

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : হাজংদের অধিবাস কোথায় ?

a) সিলেট ও মণিপুর

b) রংপুর ও দিনাজপুর

c) ময়মনসিংহ ও নেত্রকোনা

d) কক্সবাজার ও রামু

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : ১,৩,৬,১০,১৫,২১........ ধারাটির দশম পদ কত?

a) ৪৫

b) ৫৫

c) ৪২

d) ৬৫

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : আপনি কি দয়া করে তাকে বলতে পারবেন যে তার স্ত্রী কল দিয়েছিলো?

a) Can you tell him his wife call, please?

b) You can tell him his wife called, please?

c) Can you tell to him his wife called, please?

d) Can you tell him his wife called, please?

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : স্যালিক এসিড-

a) আমলকীতে পাওয়া যায়

b) কমলালেবুতে পাওয়া যায়

c) আঙ্গুরে পাওয়া যায়

d) কোনটিই নয়

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : যে যন্ত্রের সাহায্যে পরবর্তী উচ্চ বিভবকে নিম্ন বিভবে এবং নিম্ন বিভবে রুপান্তরিত করা হয় তার নাম কি ?

a) মোটর

b) জেনারেটর

c) ট্রান্সফর্মার

d) ডায়নামো

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : Naither Rini nor Simi __ qualified for the job.

a) is

b) Are

c) were

d) had

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."