Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9789

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1734
Question - 1 : শেভেন চুক্তি হচ্ছে -

a) কর হ্রাস করা চুক্তি

b) বাণিজ্যচুক্তি

c) অবাধ চলাচল সংক্রান্ত চুক্তি

d) এর কোনটি নয়


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : মাসিক মোহাম্মদী কোন সালে প্রকাশিত হয়?

a) ১৯২৬

b) ১৯২৮

c) ১৯০৩

d) ১৯২৯


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : সে মুখের ওপর আমায় গালাগাল দিল |

a) He curse me to my face.

b) He cursed to me to my face.

c) He cursed me in my face.

d) He cursed me to my face.


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : The price of rice are _.

a) risen

b) Raising

c) rising

d) raised


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : Choose the right word to fill the blank : The proper function of the press is surely to - the man in the street with facts.

a) deliver

b) equip

c) proffer

d) provide


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : যুক্তরাষ্ট্র ইউনিয়ন এ কোন ষ্টেট সর্বশেষ যোগ দেয় ?

a) হাওয়াই

b) আরিজোনা

c) টেক্সাস

d) ফ্লোরিডা


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : মানুষের গায়ের রং কোন উপাদানের উপাদানের উপর নির্ভর করে?

a) হিমোগ্লোবিন

b) ক্যলোরিন

c) থায়ামিন

d) মেলানিন


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : তুমি কি তাদের বিয়ের অনুষ্ঠানে যোগ দিচ্ছ?

a) Are you going to attend their wedding?

b) Are you go to attend their wedding?

c) You are going to attend their wedding?

d) You are go to attend their wedding?


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : সর্বাপেক্ষা ছোট তরঙ্গদৈর্ঘ্যের বিকিরণ হচ্ছে-

a) গামা রশ্মি

b) রঞ্জন রশ্মি

c) বিটা রশ্মি

d) আলফা রশ্মি


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : "ইরাটম" কি ?

a) উন্নত জাতের ধান

b) উন্নত জাতের ইক্ষু

c) উন্নত জাতের পাট

d) উন্নত জাতের চা


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."