Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9783

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1678
Question - 1 : তুমি একটুও বদলাও নি |

a) You have not changed a bit.

b) You have not change bit.

c) You have not change a bit.

d) You have not to change a bit.


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : কাজী নজরুল ইসলাম কোন কবিতা রচনার জন্য কারাবরণ করেন?

a) প্রলয়োল্লাস

b) আনন্দময়ীর আগমনে

c) বিদ্রোহী

d) নারী


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : তোমাকে একটা প্রশ্ন করতে পারি?

a) Can I ask you a question?

b) Could I ask you a question?

c) Could I ask you question?

d) I can ask you a question?


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : বৈদ্যুতিক ইস্ত্রি ও হিটারে ব্যবহৃত হয়

a) নাইক্রোম তার

b) টাংস্টেন তার

c) এন্টিমনি তার

d) কপার তার


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : A person who write about his own life writers-.

a) an autobiography

b) a chronicle

c) a diary

d) a biography


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : He watched the boat __ down the river.

a) had floated

b) was floating

c) to float

d) floating


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের সিনেটের মোট আসন সংখ্যা কতটি ?

a) ১০০

b) ১০১

c) ৯৯

d) ১০২


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : ঐতিহাসিক ২১-দফা দাবির প্রথম দাবিটি কী ছিল ?

a) পূর্ববাংলার অর্থনৈতিক বৈষম্য দূরীকরণ

b) প্রাদেশিক স্বায়ত্তশাসন

c) বাংলাকে অন্যতম রাষ্ট্রভাষা

d) বিনা ক্ষতিপূরণে জমিদারী উচ্ছেদ


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : তুমি বরং ব্যাংক থেকে ঋণ নাও |

a) You had better to get a loan from bank.

b) You had better get a loan from bank.

c) You had better get a loan to bank.

d) You had better get a loan from the bank.


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : মধ্য এশিয়ায় অবস্থিত আয়তনে সর্ববৃহৎ প্রজাতন্ত্রের নাম-

a) কাজাকিস্তান

b) তাজিকিস্তান

c) উজবেকিস্তান

d) কিরগিজস্তান


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."