Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : ফটোইলেকট্রিক কোষের ওপর আলোক পড়লে কী উৎপন্ন হয়?

a) তাপ

b) চুম্বক

c) কিছু হয় না

d) বিদ্যুৎ

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : √2/(√6+2) সমান-

a) 3+√2

b) 3-√2

c) √3-√2

d) √3+2

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : তুমি এটা নিতে পারো |

a) You may takeed this.

b) You may take that.

c) You can to take this.

d) You may take this.

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : বিদ্যুৎবাহী তারে পাখী বসলে সাধারণত বিদ্যুৎস্পৃষ্ট হয় না, কারণ-

a) পাখীর দেহের ভিতর দিয়ে বিদ্যুৎ প্রবাহিত হয় না

b) বিদ্যুৎস্পৃষ্ট হলেও পাখী মরে না

c) মাটির সঙ্গে সংযোগ হয় না

d) পাখীর গায়ে বিদ্যুৎরোধী আবরন থাকে

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : ‘পুষ্পসৌরভ’ কোন সমাসের উদাহরণ?

a) বহুব্রীহি

b) কর্মধারয়

c) অব্যয়ীভাব

d) তৎপুরুষ

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : শ্রীকৃষ্ণকীর্তন' কাব্যের বড়ায়ি কী ধরনের চরিত্র ?

a) শ্রী রাধার ননদিনী

b) শ্রী রাধার শাশুড়ি

c) রাধাকৃষ্ণের প্রেমের দূতী

d) জনৈক গোপবালা

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : কেমন চলছে?

a) How do you do?

b) How are you doing?

c) How are you?

d) How do you do now?

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : 'Good' is to 'bad' as 'white' is to_

a) Dark

b) grey

c) black

d) ebony

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : We were waiting for the bus. The underlined part is.

a) a verb phrase

b) a prepositional phrase

c) an infinitive

d) a noun phrase

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : হাই, কেমন আছেন আপনি? আপনাকে দেখে ভালো লাগলো !

a) Hi, how are you do? It’s good to see you!

b) Hi, how are you doing now? It’s good to see you!

c) Hi, how are you doing? It’s good to see you!

d) Hi, how are you? It good to see you!

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."