Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : গ্রীক শব্দ কোনটি?

a) দাম

b) কুশন

c) লুঙ্গি

d) তুফান

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : এখানে কিছু তথ্য এবং চিত্র দেয়া হলো |

a) Here is some facts and figures.

b) Here are some fact and figures.

c) Here are some facts and figure.

d) Here are some facts and figures.

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : 'জীবনে জ্যাঠামি ও সাহিত্যে ন্যাকামি’ সহ্য করতে পারতেন না..........।

a) বঙ্কিমচন্দ্র

b) সৈয়দ মুজতবা আলি

c) প্রমথনাথবিশী

d) প্রমথ চৌধুরী

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : বৃত্তের ব্যাস তিনগুন বৃদ্ধি করলে ক্ষেত্রফল কতগুন বৃদ্ধি পাবে?

a) ১২



d) ১৬

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : আমি ইংরেজিতে ভাল নই |

a) I am not good in English.

b) I am not good on English.

c) I am not good to English.

d) I am not good at English.

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : তুমি একটুও বদলাও নি |

a) You have not changed a bit.

b) You have not change bit.

c) You have not change a bit.

d) You have not to change a bit.

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : মানুষের গায়ের রং কোন উপাদানের উপাদানের উপর নির্ভর করে?

a) হিমোগ্লোবিন

b) ক্যলোরিন

c) থায়ামিন

d) মেলানিন

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : হোয়াংহো নদীর উৎপত্তি স্থল কোথায় ?

a) কুনলুন পর্বত

b) ব্ল্যাক ফরেস্ট

c) হিমালয়

d) আল্পস

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : ‘Null and Void’- এর বাংলা পরিভাষা কোনটি ?

a) পালাবদল

b) বাতিল

c) মামুলি

d) নিরপেক্ষ

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : বাংলা সাহিত্যে কখন গদ্যের সূচনা হয় ?

a) উনিশ শতকে

b) ষোড়শ শতকে

c) ত্রয়োদশ শতকে

d) নবম

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."