Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9790

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1897
Question - 1 : A farmer had 17 hens.All but 9 died.How many live hens were left ?

a) 18

b) 0

c) 9

d) 16


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : He watched the boat __ down the river.

a) had floated

b) was floating

c) to float

d) floating


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : 'Panacea' means-

a) pancreatic

b) Cure all

c) widespread disease

d) gland


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : ১৯৪৫ সালে প্রতিষ্ঠাকালীন সময়ে জাতিসংঘের মোট কতটি সদস্য রাষ্ট্র ছিল?

a) ৫১

b) ৫০

c) ৪৮

d) ৪৯


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : তুমি নিশ্চয় মজা করছো !

a) You must been kidding!

b) You must be kidding!

c) You must be kid!

d) You must be kids!


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : নিজে নিজে করো!

a) Helped yourself!

b) Help yourself!

c) Help ownself!

d) Help to yourself!


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : বাদশা ফাহাদের পর সৌদি বাদশা কে হন?

a) আবদুল্লাহ

b) খালেদ

c) ফয়সাল

d) আব্দুল আজিজ


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : আপনারা কি টাটকা সামুদ্রিক খাবার বিক্রি করেন?

a) Do you selling fresh seafood?

b) You sell fresh seafood?

c) You selling fresh seafood?

d) Do you sell fresh seafood?


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : They travelled to Savar__

a) by walking

b) on foot

c) on their feet

d) by foot


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : যে ছন্দের মুল পর্বের মাত্রা সংখ্যা চার, তাকে বলা হয়-

a) পিয়ার

b) স্বরবৃত্ত

c) মাত্রাবৃত্ত

d) অক্ষরবৃত্ত


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."