Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9788

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1700
Question - 1 : তুমি কি এখনো আমাকে ভালবাস?

a) Do you still love to me?

b) Are you still loving me?

c) Do you still love me?

d) You still love me?


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : ভারতীয় লোকসভায় নির্বাচিত সদস্য সংখ্যা কত?

a) ৫৪০

b) ৪১৫

c) ৫৪৫

d) ৫৪৩


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : তার মা তাকে স্কুলে যেত দিলেন |

a) His mother let to him go school.

b) His mother let him goes school.

c) His mother let him go to school.

d) His mother let him go school.


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : 'Geriatrics' is the branch of medicine concerned with the diseases and care of --

a) old women

b) newly-weds

c) newborn babies

d) old people


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : সমুদ্রপৃষ্ঠে বায়ুর চাপ প্রতিবর্গ সেন্টিমিটারে-

a) ১০ কি.মি.

b) ১০ নিউটন

c) ২৭ কি.মি.

d) ৫ কি.মি .


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : কোনটির অর্থ 'পক্ক' অর্থে প্রকাশ পায় ?

a) পাকা রং

b) পাকা কাজ

c) পাকা আম

d) পাকাবাড়ি


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : বাংলাদেশের গ্রামের সংখ্যা কত ?

a) ৮৫,৪৫০ টি

b) ৮৪,৫০০ টি

c) ৮৭,৩৭২ টি

d) ৮৫,৫০০ টি


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : তুমি আমাকে হতাশ করেছো |

a) You have disappoint to me.

b) You have disappointed to me.

c) You have disappointed to me

d) You have disappointed me.


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : I shall not __ the examination this year

a) go for

b) sit

c) Give

d) appear at


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : আপনি কি দয়া করে আমাকে সময়টা বলতে পারবেন?

a) Can you tell me the time please?

b) Could you tell me the time please?

c) Could you tell to me the time please?

d) Can you tell to me the time please?


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."