Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : বাংলাদেশের গ্রামের সংখ্যা কত ?

a) ৮৫,৪৫০ টি

b) ৮৪,৫০০ টি

c) ৮৭,৩৭২ টি

d) ৮৫,৫০০ টি

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : অন্ধদের জন্য লিখনরীতির উদ্ভাবন করেন-

a) লুইস ব্রেইল

b) কপার্নিকাস

c) ডেভিটবোর

d) টমাস আলভা এডিসন

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : আ্যলুমিনিয়াম সালফেটকে চলতি বাংলায় কী বলে ?

a) চুন

b) সেভিং সোপ

c) ফিটকিরি

d) কস্টিক সোডা

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : তুমি তো খুদে পণ্ডিত ।

a) You are to a little master!

b) You are a little master!

c) You are a little star!

d) You are little a master!

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : NIPORT কি?

a) বন্দর বিষয়ক গবেষনা প্রতিষ্ঠান

b) নদী বন্দর বিষয়ক গবেষনা প্রতিষ্ঠান

c) জনসংখ্যা বিষয়ক গবেষনা প্রতিষ্ঠান

d) পোলট্রীফার্ম বিষয়ক গবেষনা প্রতিষ্ঠান

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : আপনার প্রতিপাল্য আমাদের বিদ্যালয়ের ছাত্র |

a) Your ward is the student of our school.

b) Your warded is the student of our school.

c) Your wards is the student of our school.

d) Your ward is the student in our school.

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : জাতিসংঘের সদর দপ্তর কোথায় অবস্থিত?

a) জেনেভায়

b) নিউইয়র্ক

c) হেগে

d) প্যারিসে

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : কোনটি বায়ুর উপাদান নহে?

a) নাইট্রোজেন

b) হাইড্রোজেন

c) ফসফরাস

d) কার্বন

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : লোকসংখ্যার দিক থেকে বাংলাদেশ বিশ্বের কততম স্থানে?

a) ৫ম

b) ৮ম

c) ৯ম

d) ১০ম

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : তোমার এখানে থাকা চলবে না |

a) You must not be stay heare.

b) You must not stay here.

c) You must not stay in here.

d) You must not stay to heare.

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."