Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9782

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1772
Question - 1 : লেখাপড়ায় মন দাও |

a) Mind your study.

b) To keep mind your studies.

c) Mind your studies.

d) Mind to your studies.


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : জাতিসংঘ সাধারন পরিষদের প্রথম বাংলাদেশী সভাপতি কে?

a) বি.এ সিদ্দিকী

b) খাজা ওয়াসিউদ্দিন

c) হুমায়ন রশিদ চৌধুরী

d) শমসের মবিন চৌধুরী


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : পৃথিবীতে সবচেয়ে বেশি পাওয়া যায় কোন ধাতুটি?

a) সিলিকন

b) পারদ

c) ইস্পাত

d) লোহা


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : আমার সাথে আপনার কি কোন কাজ আছে?

a) Do you have business with me?

b) Do you have any business with me?

c) You have any business with me?

d) Have You any business with me?


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : Through thick and thin---- means

a) not clear in understanding

b) under all conditions

c) to make thick and thin

d) of great density


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : 'ইউরোপের ককপিট' বলা হয় কোন দেশকে ?

a) জার্মানি

b) ফ্রান্স

c) বেলজিয়াম

d) ফিনল্যান্ড


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : সাধু ও চলিত ভাষার মূল পার্থক্য কোন পদে বেশি বেশি দেখা যায় ?

a) বিশেষ্য ও ক্রিয়া

b) ক্রিয়া ও সর্বনাম

c) বিশেষণ ও ক্রিয়া

d) বিশেষ্য ও বিশেষণ পদে


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : ''শিশুরাজ্যে এই মেয়েটি একটি ছোট খাট বর্গির উপদ্রব বলিলেই হয়।''রবীন্দ্রনাথ ঠাকুরের কোন গল্পের সংলাপ?

a) সংলাপ

b) একরাত্রি

c) শুভা

d) সমাপ্তি


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : তোমার এখানে থাকা চলবে না |

a) You must not be stay heare.

b) You must not stay here.

c) You must not stay in here.

d) You must not stay to heare.


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : তুমি কি এখনো আমাকে ভালবাস?

a) Do you still love to me?

b) Are you still loving me?

c) Do you still love me?

d) You still love me?


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."