Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : বাংলাদেশ কত সালে ইসলামী সম্মেলন সংস্থার সদস্যপদ লাভ করে?

a) ১৯৭৪ সালে

b) ১৯৭৫ সালে

c) ১৯৭৩ সালে

d) ১৯৭৬ সালে

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : Many prefer donating money ..... distributing clothes.

a) but

b) to

c) Than

d) without

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : আপনি কি দয়া করে আমাকে সময়টা বলতে পারবেন?

a) Can you tell me the time, please?

b) Can you tell me time, please?

c) Can you tell to me the time, please?

d) You Can tell me the time, please?

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : We were waiting for the bus. The underlined part is.

a) a verb phrase

b) a prepositional phrase

c) an infinitive

d) a noun phrase

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : 'Good' is to 'bad' as 'white' is to_

a) Dark

b) grey

c) black

d) ebony

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : উদ্ভিদের পাতা হলদে হয়ে যায় কিসের অভাবে?

a) নাইট্রোজেনের

b) ফসফরাসের

c) ইউরিয়ার

d) পটাসিয়ামের

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : তোমাকে যেতেই হবে |

a) You must go there.

b) You must to go.

c) You must go.

d) You must be go.

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : He has been ill - Friday last.

a) in

b) since

c) on

d) from

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : আপনার কোনো প্রশ্ন আছে?

a) Do you have question?

b) Have you any question?

c) Do you have any question?

d) You have any question?

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : উরুগুয়ে রাউণ্ডের সংলাপ কত বছর ধরে চলেছিল ?

a) ৮ বছর

b) ২বছর

c) ৫ বছর

d) ৬ বছর

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."