Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9790

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1675
Question - 1 : সালোকসংশ্লেষনে সবচেয়ে বেশি হয় -

a) নীল আলোতে

b) লাল আলোতে

c) সবুজ আলোতে

d) বেগুনি আলোতে


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : Give the correct Passive form of-My teacher embodies all the good qualities.

a) All the good qualities are embodied by my teacher

b) All the good qualities are embodied in my teacher

c) All the good qualities are embodied on my teacher

d) All the good qualities are embodied to my teacher


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : বিশ্বব্যাংকের SOFT LONE WINDOW হল -

a) IBRD

b) IDA

c) MIGA

d) IFC


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : Choose the right word to fill the blank : Since his retirement, Mr. Chowdhury, who was a teacher, has written four novels

a) Already

b) Formerly

c) Presently

d) Usually


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : Naither Rini nor Simi __ qualified for the job.

a) is

b) Are

c) were

d) had


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : আমি কি কিছু বলতে পারি?

a) I can say something?

b) Can I say something?

c) Can I say something too?

d) Can I say something too?


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : বাংলা ভাষায় ব্যবহৃত মৌলিক স্বরধ্বনি কয়টি?

a) ৮টি

b) ৬টি

c) ৭টি

d) ১১টি


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : তুমি আমাকে ভুল বুঝেছো |

a) You’ve understood to me wrongly.

b) You’ve understood me wrongly.

c) You’ve understood me wrong.

d) You’ve understand me wrongly.


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : শিক্ষা সফরে যাওয়ার জন্য ২৪০০ টাকায় বাস ভাড়া করা হলো এবং প্রতেক ছাএ/ছাএী সমান ভাড়া বহন করবে ঠিক হলো ।অতিরিক্ত ১০ জন ছাত্র/ছাত্রী যাওয়ায় প্রতি জনের ভাড়া ৮ টাকা কমে গেল।বাসে কত জন ছাত্র/ছাত্রী গিয়েছিল?

a) ৬০

b) ৪৮

c) ৫০

d) ৪০


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : বাদুড় অন্ধকারে চলাফেরা করে কিভাবে ?

a) ক্রমাগত শব্দ উৎপন্ন করে অবস্থান নির্নয় করে

b) অলৌকিক ভাবে

c) তীক্ষ্ণ দৃষ্টিসম্পন্ন চোখের সাহায্যে

d) সৃস্ট শব্দের প্রতিধ্বনি শুনে


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."