Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : A farmer had 17 hens.All but 9 died.How many live hens were left ?

a) 18

b) 0

c) 9

d) 16

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : বাংলা বর্ণমালায় স্বরবর্ণ কয়টি?

a) ১৩টি

b) ১২টি

c) ১১টি

d) ১০টি

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : Julia has been ill _three months.

a) about

b) in

c) for

d) Since

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : চা পাতায় কোন ভিটামিন থাকে ?

a) ভিটামিন কে

b) ভিটামিন এ

c) ভিটামিন বি কমপ্লেক্স

d) ভিটামিন ই

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : বাংলা ভাষায় প্রথম সাময়িকপত্র কোনটি ?

a) সংবাদ প্রভাকর

b) দিগদর্শন

c) তত্তবোধিনী

d) বঙ্গদর্শন

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : সমুদ্রপৃষ্ঠে বায়ুর চাপ প্রতিবর্গ সেন্টিমিটারে-

a) ১০ কি.মি.

b) ১০ নিউটন

c) ২৭ কি.মি.

d) ৫ কি.মি .

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : Choose the correct indirect speech- She asked me “Are you happy in your new job?”

a) She asked me if I had been happy in my new job

b) She asked me whether I am happy in my new job

c) She asked me if I have been happy in my new job

d) She asked me if I was happy in my new job

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : টাকায় ৩টি করে লেবু কিনে টাকায় ২ টি করে বিক্রি করলে শতকরা কত লাভ হবে?

a) ৩০%

b) ২০%

c) ৫০%

d) ৩৩

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : আমি ইংরেজিতে ভাল নই |

a) I am not good in English.

b) I am not good on English.

c) I am not good to English.

d) I am not good at English.

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : তোমাকে স্মার্ট হতে হবে |

a) You have to be smarts.

b) You have to be smarted.

c) You have to be smart too.

d) You have to be smart.

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."