Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9783

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1695
Question - 1 : Identify the imparative sentence.

a) has been raining since morning

b) I shall go to college.

c) Motin is singing a song

d) Stand up


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : সাপ্তাহিক ‘সুধাকর’ এর সম্পাদক কে?

a) মুন্সি মোহাম্মদ রিয়াজ উদ্দিন আহম্মদ

b) মুন্সি মোহাম্মদ মেহের উল্লা

c) ইসমাইল হোসেন সিরাজি

d) শেখ আবদুর রহিম


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : তুমি এখনো ঘুমাওনি?

a) Haven’t slept yet?

b) Haven’t you slept yet?

c) Haven’t you slept?

d) Have not you slept yet?


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : কোনটি বিংশ শতাব্দীর শেষভাগে উপনিবেশবাদের নিকট থেকে মুক্ত হয়?

a) ম্যাকাউ

b) বাংলাদেশ

c) শ্রীলংকা

d) হংকং


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : The word bountry is closest in meaning to-

a) sympathy

b) dividing line

c) familiar

d) generosity


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : ইনসুলিন নিঃসৃত হয় কোন গ্রন্থি থেকে?

a) অগ্ন্যাশয়

b) পিটুইটারি গ্রন্থি

c) থাইরয়েড গ্রন্থি

d) যকৃত


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : The word 'electorate' means :

a) election office

b) a body of voter

c) many elections

d) candidates


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : দয়া করে আমাকে বানানটা বলবেন?

a) Could you spell that for me, please?

b) Could you spelling that for me, please?

c) Can you spell that for me, please?

d) Can you spelling that for me, please?


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : 'Botany' is to 'plants' as 'Zoology' is to-.

a) dear

b) animals

c) trees

d) Flowers


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : যুক্তরাষ্ট্রে একজন প্রেসিডেন্ট ১২ বছর ক্ষমতায় ছিলেন । তিনি হচ্ছেন

a) জেমস মনরো

b) হ্যারি এস ট্রুম্যান

c) তথ্যটি সঠিক নয়

d) ফ্রাঙ্কলিন রুজভেল্ট


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."