Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9783

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1632
Question - 1 : তুমি কন মুখে আমায় এ কথা বল?

a) Can you have the face to tell me this?

b) How can you have the face to tell me this?

c) How you have the face to tell me this?

d) How can you have the face to me tell this?


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : কোন কোন স্থানে সলিড ফিনাইল ব্যাবহার করা হয়?

a) পায়খানা, প্রস্রাবখানায়

b) গোসলখানায়

c) পুকুরে

d) নালায়


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : স্যালিক এসিড-

a) আমলকীতে পাওয়া যায়

b) কমলালেবুতে পাওয়া যায়

c) আঙ্গুরে পাওয়া যায়

d) কোনটিই নয়


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : What is the meaning of 'White Elephant'?

a) a hoarder

b) a very costly or troublesome possession

c) a black marketer

d) An elephant of white colour


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : দক্ষিণ আফ্রিকা কত বছর শ্বেতাঙ্গ শাসনে ছিল ?

a) ৩০০বছর

b) ৩৩৫বছর

c) ৩৪২ বছর

d) ৫০০বছর


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : মঙ্গলযুগের সর্বশেষ কবির নাম কী ?

a) বিজয় গুপ্ত

b) ভারতচন্দ্র রায়গুণাকার

c) মুকূন্দারাম চক্রবর্তী

d) কানাহরি দত্ত


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : কোনটি ভারতের সেভেন সিস্টারস রাজ্যসমূহের অন্তর্ভুক্ত নয়?

a) ত্রিপুরা

b) মনিপুর

c) কেরালা

d) মিজোরাম


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : fill in the blank with the appropriate preposition: We have to go...... five minutes.

a) In

b) Beautifully

c) On

d) By


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : রাজেন্দ্রপুর সেনানিবাসে অবস্থিত মুক্তিযুদ্ধের স্মৃতিস্তম্ভের নাম কি?

a) স্বাধীনতা সোপান

b) রক্ত সোপান

c) বিজয়কেতন

d) বিজয় স্তম্ভ


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : ফ্রান্সের বর্তমান প্রেসিডেন্টের নাম কী ?

a) নিকোলাস সার্কোজি

b) ফ্রঁসিয়ে মিতেরাঁ

c) জেনারেল দ্য গল

d) ফ্রাঁসোয়া ওঁলাদ


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."