Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : ভদ্র মহিলা এবং ভদ্র মহোদয়গন, আপনাদের ধন্যবাদ এখানে আসার জন্য |

a) Hello, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for coming.

b) Hello, ladies and gentlemens, thank you for coming.

c) Hello, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for come.

d) Hello, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for coming here.

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : যে যন্ত্রের সাহায্যে পরবর্তী উচ্চ বিভবকে নিম্ন বিভবে এবং নিম্ন বিভবে রুপান্তরিত করা হয় তার নাম কি ?

a) মোটর

b) জেনারেটর

c) ট্রান্সফর্মার

d) ডায়নামো

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : নিচের কোন ভগ্নাংশটি বৃহত্তম ?

a) ৬/১১

b) ৮/১৪

c) ৩/৫

d) ৫/৮

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : Amnesty International কত সালে নোবেল শান্তি পুরস্কার পেয়েছিল?

a) ১৯৮১

b) ১৯৭৯

c) ১৯৭৮

d) ১৯৭৭

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : আমি ইংরেজিতে ভাল নই |

a) I am not good in English.

b) I am not good on English.

c) I am not good to English.

d) I am not good at English.

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : If a man swims 4 miters upstream at 1 mph and back downstream to the same point at 4 mph, what is his average speed ?

a) 0.8 mph

b) 3.2 mph

c) 2.4 mph

d) 1.6 mph

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : বিভক্তহীন নাম শব্দকে কী বলে?

a) প্রাতিপদিক

b) নাম-পদ

c) মৌলিক শব্দ

d) কৃদন্ত শব্দ

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : প্রত্যক্ষ কোন বস্তুর সাথে পরোক্ষ কোন বস্তুর তুলনা করলে প্রত্যক্ষ বস্তুটিকে বলা হয়.............

a) উপমেয়

b) উপমান

c) উপমিত

d) রূপক

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : পিতা ও মাতা বয়সের গড় ৪৫ বছর। আবার পিতা, মাতা ও এক পুত্রের বয়সের গড় ৩৬ বছর।পুত্রের বয়স কত?

a) ৯ বছর

b) ১৪ বছর

c) ১৫ বছর

d) ১৮ বছর

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : আমি তোমাকে আমার ভাইকে সাহায্য করার জন্য বলতে পারি?

a) Can I ask you to help my brother?

b) Could I ask you help my brother?

c) Could I ask you to help my brother?

d) Can I ask you help my brother?

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."