Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9789

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1575
Question - 1 : এই তো এখানে।

a) Here they.

b) Here am I.

c) Here they are.

d) Here’s they are.


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : তোমার এত বেশি মদ্যপান করা উচিত না |

a) You shouldn’t drink so much beer

b) You shouldn’t drink so much beer.

c) You shouldn’t drink so it much beer.

d) You shouldn’t drink so much beers.


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : শেভেন চুক্তি হচ্ছে -

a) কর হ্রাস করা চুক্তি

b) বাণিজ্যচুক্তি

c) অবাধ চলাচল সংক্রান্ত চুক্তি

d) এর কোনটি নয়


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : কাজী নজরুল ইসলাম কোন কবিতা রচনার জন্য কারাবরণ করেন?

a) প্রলয়োল্লাস

b) আনন্দময়ীর আগমনে

c) বিদ্রোহী

d) নারী


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : তোমার ডিনার (রাতের খাবার) কেমন হয়েছে?

a) How are your dinner?

b) How is your dinner?

c) How is your night dinner?

d) How is you dinner?


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : আপনার ফ্লাইট বিলম্বিত হয়েছে |

a) Your flight is delay.

b) Your flight to delayed.

c) Your flight is delayed.

d) Your flight is delayed too.


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : A person who write about his own life writers-.

a) an autobiography

b) a chronicle

c) a diary

d) a biography


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : তুমি মনে হয় আমার সাথে মজা করছো !

a) You’ve got to be kid me!

b) You’ve got to be kids me!

c) You’ve got to be kidding me!

d) You’ve got to be kidding to me!


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : জারণ বিক্রিয়ায় কী ঘটে?

a) ইলেক্ট্রন আদান-প্রদান

b) ইলেক্ট্রন বর্জন

c) ইলেক্ট্রন গ্রহণ

d) শুধু তাপ উৎপন্ন হয়


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : He _ consciousness as a result of his hitting the car\'s dashboard.

a) passed

b) Failed

c) broke

d) lost


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."