Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9788

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1799
Question - 1 : শব্দের তীব্রতা নির্নায়ক যন্ত্র-

a) অ্যামিটার

b) অডিওমিটার

c) অডিওফোন

d) অলটিমিটার


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : NASA-এর সদরদপ্তর কোথায় ?

a) ওয়াশিংটন

b) হিউস্টন

c) কেপ কেনেডি

d) টেক্সাস


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : তোমার কাছে কি খুচরা আছে?

a) You have change?

b) Do you have some change?

c) Do you have a change?

d) Do you have change?


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : ক ও খ একএে একটি কাজ ১২ দিনে করতে পারে । ক একা কাজটি ২০ দিনে করতে পারে । খ একা কাজটি কতদিনে করতে পারবে?

a) ৩০দিনে

b) ২৫ দিনে

c) ৩৫ দিনে

d) ৪০ দিনে


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : কোন তারিখে 'আন্তর্জাতিক পরিবেস দিবস' পালিত হয় ?

a) ৫ জুন

b) ২১ মার্চ

c) ৫ জুলাই

d) ২১ জুন


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : তুমি এটা নিতে পারো |

a) You may takeed this.

b) You may take that.

c) You can to take this.

d) You may take this.


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : ‘চন্দ্রাবতী’ কী?

a) নাটক

b) পালাগান

c) পদাবলী

d) কাব্য


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : আপনার টিকেট নিশ্চিত হয়েছে |

a) Your ticket have been confirmed.

b) Your tickets have been confirm.

c) Your tickets has been confirmed.

d) Your tickets have been confirmed.


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : সংবিধানের কোন অনুচ্ছেদে “রাষ্ট্র ও গনজীবনের সর্বস্তরে নারী পুরুষের সমান অধিকার লাভ করবেন” বলা আছে?

a) ১০ নং অনুচ্ছেদে

b) ২১(২) নং অনুচ্ছেদে

c) ২৮(২) নং অনুচ্ছেদে

d) ২৭ নং অনুচ্ছেদে


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : 'Light' is to 'dark' as 'cold' is to _.

a) cool

b) winter

c) heat

d) Hot


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."