Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9789

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1789
Question - 1 : | 1-2x | < 1 এর সমাধান

a) -2 < x < 1

b) -1 < x < 1

c) -1 < x < 0

d) 0 < x < 1


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : ‘ব্যক্ত’ শব্দের বিপরীতার্থক শব্দ কোনটি?

a) ত্যক্ত

b) গূঢ়

c) দূঢ়

d) গ্রাহ্য


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : Which of the following words has been formed with a prefix?

a) authentic

b) amoral

c) amnesia

d) aspersions


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : কাটাকাটি করতে পারবেন না।

a) You can’t pens through.

b) You can’t pen to through.

c) You can’t pen throughs.

d) You can’t pen through.


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : 'Light' is to 'dark' as 'cold' is to _.

a) cool

b) winter

c) heat

d) Hot


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : মালয়েশিয়ার সাবেক প্রধানমন্ত্রী ড: মাহাথির মোহাম্মদ কত বছর ক্ষমতায় ছিলেন?

a) ২১ বছর

b) ২২ বছর

c) ২৪ বছর

d) ২৬ বছর


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : আমার কাছে কিছু লুকাচ্ছ তুমি |

a) You are hiding something back to me.

b) You are hiding something back to me.

c) You are hiding something backed to me.

d) You are hiding something back me.


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : কোনটি উপন্যাস?

a) নেমেসিস

b) গড্ডালিকা

c) নতুন চাঁদ

d) কন্যা কুমারী


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : তুমি কি নিয়মিত ব্যায়াম কর?

a) Do you exercise regular?

b) You exercise regularly?

c) Are you exercise regularly?

d) Do you exercise regularly?


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : অন্ধদের জন্য লিখনরীতির উদ্ভাবন করেন-

a) লুইস ব্রেইল

b) কপার্নিকাস

c) ডেভিটবোর

d) টমাস আলভা এডিসন


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."