Total Question


Compleated Test


Total Syllabus


Visitor Counter

Question - 1 : চা খেলে কেমন হয়?

a) How about an cup of tea?

b) How about a cup tea?

c) Have a cup of tea?

d) How about a cup of tea?

Discus in Board
Question - 2 : They travelled to Savar__

a) by walking

b) on foot

c) on their feet

d) by foot

Discus in Board
Question - 3 : প্র ,পরা, অপ -

a) বাংলা উপসর্গ

b) বিদেশী উপসর্গ

c) সংস্কৃত উপসর্গ

d) উপসর্গস্থানীয় অব্যয়

Discus in Board
Question - 4 : জীব জগতের জন্য সবচেয়ে ক্ষতিকর রশ্মি কোনটি ?

a) বিটা রশ্মি

b) গামা রশ্মি

c) আলফা রশ্মি

d) আলট্রাভায়োলেট রশ্মি

Discus in Board
Question - 5 : A rocket flying to the moon does not need wings because _.

a) space is airless

b) it has no fuel

c) pace has too much dust

d) it has no engine

Discus in Board
Question - 6 : 'Panacea' means-

a) pancreatic

b) Cure all

c) widespread disease

d) gland

Discus in Board
Question - 7 : 'ডেভিস কাপ' কোন খেলায় দেয়া হয়?

a) লন টেনিস

b) ব্যাডমিন্টন

c) টেবিল টেনিস

d) ক্রিকেট

Discus in Board
Question - 8 : বিদ্যুৎবাহী তারে পাখী বসলে সাধারণত বিদ্যুৎস্পৃষ্ট হয় না, কারণ-

a) পাখীর দেহের ভিতর দিয়ে বিদ্যুৎ প্রবাহিত হয় না

b) বিদ্যুৎস্পৃষ্ট হলেও পাখী মরে না

c) মাটির সঙ্গে সংযোগ হয় না

d) পাখীর গায়ে বিদ্যুৎরোধী আবরন থাকে

Discus in Board
Question - 9 : 'দীনবন্ধু মিত্রের প্রহসন কোনটি ?

a) কিঞ্চিত জলযোগ

b) বুড়ো শালিকের ঘাড়ে রোঁ

c) বিয়ে পাগলা বুড়ো

d) কল্কি অবতার

Discus in Board
Question - 10 : তোমার দেশের জন্য কিছু করা উচিৎ ছিল |

a) You should have do something for the country.

b) You should have done something for the country.

c) You should have done something to the country.

d) You should have done something for your country.

Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?


 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."