Total Question


600

Compleated Test


9783

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1732
Question - 1 : বিভক্তহীন নাম শব্দকে কী বলে?

a) প্রাতিপদিক

b) নাম-পদ

c) মৌলিক শব্দ

d) কৃদন্ত শব্দ


Discus in Board
Question - 2 : এ মাটি সোনার বাড়া’এ উদ্ধৃতিতে সোনা কোন অর্থে ব্যবহার করা হয়েছে?

a) বিশেষনের অতিশায়ন

b) রূপবাচক বিশেষন

c) উপাদান বাচক বিশেষন

d) বিধেয় বিশেষন


Discus in Board
Question - 3 : বাংলা ভাষায় কয়টি খাঁটি উপসর্গ রয়েছে?

a) কুড়ি

b) একুশ

c) উনিশ

d) বাইশ


Discus in Board
Question - 4 : The word 'precedence' means

a) priority

b) example

c) elderly

d) case


Discus in Board
Question - 5 : ৪ টাকায় ৫টি করে কিনে ৫ টাকায় ৪ টি করে বিক্রয় করলে শতকরা কত লাভ হবে?

a) ৫২.৭৫%

b) ৫৬.২৫%

c) ৪৮.৫০%

d) ৪৫%


Discus in Board
Question - 6 : তুমি এখনো ঘুমাওনি?

a) Haven’t slept yet?

b) Haven’t you slept yet?

c) Haven’t you slept?

d) Have not you slept yet?


Discus in Board
Question - 7 : As the sun - , I decided to go out.

a) has shone

b) shine

c) shines

d) was shining


Discus in Board
Question - 8 : তোমার এখানে থাকা চলবে না |

a) You must not be stay heare.

b) You must not stay here.

c) You must not stay in here.

d) You must not stay to heare.


Discus in Board
Question - 9 : If the second day of the month is a Monday, the eighteenth day of the month is a _.

a) Sunday

b) Tuesday

c) Wednesday

d) Monday


Discus in Board
Question - 10 : অভিন্ন ইউরোপ গঠনের লক্ষে মাসট্রিচট চুক্তি অনুমোদনের জন্য কোন দেশ দুবার গণভোটের আয়োজন করেছিল ?

a) আয়ারল্যান্ড

b) গ্রীস

c) ডেনমার্ক

d) লুক্সেমবার্গ


Discus in Board

Ensuring Communications With Law Firm In-House Counsel

More law offices are utilizing in-house insight to exhort them on potential cases against the firm, just as giving counsel on morals and hazard the executives issues. In Arizona, under A.R.S. 12-2234, with regards to common cases, any correspondences between a lawyer for an association or related substance –, for example, a law office – and a worker or specialist of the organization or related element, made to give lawful guidance or getting data to give lawful counsel, are secured by the lawyer customer benefit.

 The inquiry at that point turns out to be, how can one viably ensure such advantaged interchanges with in-house counsel from revelation should a case later emerge?

 THE PALMER CASE

 A California choice gives direction on the accepted procedures for securing correspondences with law office in-house counsel. In Palmer v. Unrivaled Court, a customer procured a law office to indict a claim. Shelton was the accomplice in control. The customer before long undermined cases against the firm, yet demanded it keep speaking to him until he held substitute insight. During that period, Shelton counseled with two lawyers inside the firm, Swope and Christman, about the customer's objections.

 At the point when the customer later sued the firm and Shelton for negligence, the firm affirmed that correspondences among Shelton and the in-house counsel were favored. The firm submitted proof that Swope was the association's General Counsel and Christman was its Claims Counsel, and that they shared duty on claims dealing with and misfortune counteractive action. In-house counsel had numerous correspondences exhorting Shelton about reacting to the customer's objections and on the best way to deal with the customer relationship. Swope and Christman appointed another accomplice to administer arrangement of pleadings for the customer, who spoke with Shelton as their "appointee." The firm didn't charge the customer for time brought about by Swope, Christman or their "representative."